Disclosure

INVESTING IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS INVOLVES RISKS. OPTIONS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS.

Please sign up for our Free Investment Newsletter

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

March 7th CSX Investment Rationale


March 7th 2012
CSX:                                      $20.25
Market Cap:                       $21.4 Billion
Dividend Yield:                  2.37%
P/B:                                       2.5
2011 Net Income:            $1.822 Billion
2011 Free Cash Flow:      $1,396 Billion

Company Overview:  CSX is one of the largest North American railroad companies controlling 21,000 miles of track, predominantly on the eastern United States.  CSX hauls shipments of coal products (32% of consolidated revenue), chemicals (14%), intermodal traffic (12%), and a diverse mix of other merchandise.  CSX serves major population centers in 23 states east of the Mississippi River, the District of Columbia and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec.  It has access to over 70 ocean, river and lake port terminals along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, the Mississippi River, the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway.  CSX operates more than 4,000 locomotives, of which over 95% are owned by the company.  CSX like other railroad operators has seen substantial growth in earnings and free cash flow over the last five years through more efficient operations.
Investment Thesis:  CSX has gone from being one of the chronic underachievers in the railroad space, to a top competitor.  Nowhere is this more evident than in the improvement that they have shown in their operating ratio, which has fallen from 90% in 2003, to a much more comfortable 71%.  Management under the leadership of Michael Ward, is laser focused on continuously improving the business, and their goal is to reduce the operating ratio to 65% which would imply a 35% EBIT margin. 
Railroads are by far and away the most efficient and cost effective method for long haul shipments, as they can move an enormous amount of goods while burning substantially less fuel than large haul trucks.  It is estimated that trucks carry 70 percent of all freight in the United States, but according to the EPA their greenhouse emissions are five times higher than freight transportation. The Association of American Railroads estimates that on average, a freight train can move 1 ton of freight about 484 miles on just one gallon of fuel.  Improvements in technology continue to widen this gap in freight’s favor. According to Matt Rose, CEO of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, long-haul trains are three times more fuel efficient than trucks, so with oil prices hovering over $100 there is little doubt that trains will continue to gobble up share in the shipping industry.
CSX has improved their return on invested capital from 1.82% in 2003 to 10.4% in 2011.  This is immensely important because one of the main negatives of the railroad industry is the capital intensive nature of the business.  CSX like other railroads, will often spend up to 20% of revenue on capital expenditures, and free cash flow just about always lags net income.   At T&T Capital Management we believe that CSX has a wide moat due to their irreplaceable tracks on the east coast.  Therefore we believe that they should be able to continue to earn more than their cost of capital on future investments. 
CSX yields 2.37%, and we would expect that dividend to continue to grow over the next 3-5 years along with earnings.  CSX’s heavy reliance on coal and ethanol is a little bit of a concern with the abundance of North American natural gas reshaping the energy industry, but we still expect loads and pricing to continue to improve throughout the decade.   Currently coal accounts for 32% of revenue, which is second to the merchandise business that accounts for 54% of revenue and 41% of volume.  The merchandise business should improve along with the economy as it consists of materials like crushed stone, sand, gravel, fertilizer, food, consumer goods, etc.   We also really like the intermodal business which is in direct competition with the trucking industry, and we believe that both exports and imports will be growing over time to the benefit of CSX. At less than 10 times forward earnings CSX is not absurdly cheap, but we feel that the stock should trade at about 14 times our 2012 $2.00 a share EPS estimate, which would imply a $28.00 price target.  Downside is limited due to the stability of the business, and the dividend yield is quite a bit better than 10 year treasuries.  CSX should grow revenue at a slightly higher rate than GDP for the forseeable future, so when you start with an earnings yield around 10%, earnings growth should be very rewarding even under the assumption that the earnings multiple does not expand.
In 2011, CSX repurchased a total of $1.6 billion in common stock, and has $734 million remaining under their new $2 billion program.  At the current price that the stock is trading at, we believe that share buybacks are extremely beneficial to shareholders.  The company does carry about $8.7 billion in long term debt but they improved their coverage ratios exponentially over the last few years, giving us confidence that their financial condition will remain strong.

Treasury Selling $6 Billion in AIG

Today Treasury announced that they will be selling $6 Billion of AIG stock, and AIG announced that they will be buying up to $3 Billion of it.  This is enormously accretive to AIG shareholders being that if AIG were to pay $29 a share from Treasury, they would be purchasing their own stock at 52% of their book value of $55.  AIG's core operating businesses are performing better after some painful increases to their reserves in their Chartis unit last year.  This announcement follows the recent news that AIG is divesting a portion of their stake in the Asian insurer AIG to pay back the rest of their loan from Treasury.

I've been very impressed with the management of Robert Benmosche who is battling cancer, while rebuilding this formerly great insurance, after a period of horrendous management and risk controls. Because of AIG's size and the massive government investment there is a great deal of uncertainty as to their capital requirements which I believe is an overhang on the stock.  To see that they are being allowed to buy back $3 Billion of stock after already announcing a $1 Billion buy back last quarter shows that this is a company moving in the right direction.  Below is the Bloomberg article referenced:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-07/aig-to-buy-up-to-3-billion-of-its-shares-on-offer-in-6-billion-u-s-sale.html

Comeback for Eddie Lambert

Fortune has a great article on Eddie Lambert, who happens to be the best performing Hedge Fund thus far in 2012 after a rough 2011.  While three months performance doesn't make him a genius, one bad year doesn't make him incompetent either.

The only way to assess a money manager is through understanding the investment process, and/or a long term track record consistent with that process.  Track record alone is not enough because there a lot of scams out there where investment managers have 30 different funds with different methods and they sell the one or two that are showing strong performance.  These types of funds usually have high fees and a trading strategy that makes no sense.

The beauty of value investing is that the process is understandable and repeatable.  Over the long term it tends to outperform by a significant margin.  The people that aren't successful with a true value investor typically don't allow the proper time horizon for the investments to mature.  Bruce Berkowitz last year was named Morningstar's fund manager of the decade, and his assets swelled dramatically only to have by far away the worst year of his career in 2011.  Clients abandoned his fund in droves yet in 2012 he is one of the top performing managers, and I'd fully expect him to do quite well in the next decade because of the method he uses.  Below is a link to the article on Lambert:
 http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/03/07/edward-lampert-comeback-2012/

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

WSJ Article- Trouble for Baby Boomers

The article below does a good job of pointing out some of the supply/demand problems that Baby Boomers face in meeting their retirement goals.  It isn't practical to invest in overly diversified mutual funds or ETF's and expect the returns that most investors need to maintain their same living standards into retirement.  At T&T Capital Management we use an active strategy where we buy stocks at deep discounts to intrinsic value.  Often these companies are in out of favor, or potentially distressed industries, and we are able to take advantage of a time arbitrage as the outlook improves.  These opportunities to buy businesses at 50-60% discounts to intrinsic value are only available because the majority of Wall Street focuses on the short term so they aren't willing to use the patience required to actually "invest".  In addition to this we incorporate the selling of stock options for the purposes of reducing risk, generating income, and to instill disciplined selling practices.  These strategies take time and discipline but the payoff can be tremendous.  When I read articles like this WSJ one, I'm befuddled by the lack of real advice or a plan on how to attack the problem.  I truly believe that our method offers the best opportunities for those that are focused on maximizing risk adjusted returns, and that have a reasonable time horizon.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204795304577223632111866416.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read

Martin Whitman and Third Avenue Funds 1st Quarter Commentary

Over the weekend Third Avenue Funds released their quarterly commentary, which always includes wonderful commentaries from their fund managers let by their Chairman Martin Whitman, whose investment philosophy as articulated by his shareholder letters and books, have become a  key component to our core value investing philosophy at T&T.  Whitman is unique in that he focuses much more on the balance sheet than the income statement.  This the opposite of most modern investment analysis which is based on analyzing and predicting earnings. Whitman rationalizes this approach by emphasizing that value creation doesn't always pass through the income statement as earnings, but instead can be created from more effective utilization of the balance sheet.

Wealth creation is defined as growth in net asset value which for many companies such as banks, insurance companies, and investment management companies, is defined by book value.  Warren Buffett has always defined his success as an investor through the compounding of book value as opposed to earnings on any one year.  Because of the limitation of General Accepted Accounting Principles, an analyst must make adjustments to the balance sheet and to earnings, to measure true intrinsic value.  A perfect example of this is represented by the income statement and balance sheet of AIG in the last decade.  AIG constantly had to increase their reserves for various insurance exposures which showed that their book value had almost always been overstated, and their prior quarters earnings were inflated due to lower reserve estimates.  Management's might be incentivized to juice short term earnings by improper reserving of future losses, because of bonus structures, or short term pressure to meet earnings estimates.

Whitman has always stated that intrinsic value can be created by super attractive access to capital, such as non-recourse mortgages that provide low cost financing without risk to the holding company.  He also acknowledges that many times companies have assets such as real estate, patents, equipment, etc, that is not core to the operating activities of a business, that might be better utilized in a sale, spin off, sale lease-back, or other optimal resource allocation.

One of the biggest difficulties in investing is understanding management.  Often times management has a short track record that makes it difficult to have a great deal of confidence that they will do what they say they will.  Because of the short term focus on Wall Street, many CEO's feel that need to meet next quarter's earnings estimates instead of taking the steps to maximize shareholder value over the long term.  When you have a management that can be trusted to act in the shareholder's best interests, the value of the business is significantly greater.  Activities such as share buybacks at discounts to intrinsic value can be extremely accretive, while value destroying mergers such as HPQ's $10 billion acquisition of Autonomy can kill an investment.  Whitman protects against risk by buying companies that have super strong financial positions, and that are trading at substantial discounts to NAV or "intrinsic value." Ideally he'd like to also buy companies that can grow NAV by 10% annually over the next 3-7 years.

When we talk about a company such as Bank of America with a book value around $20 per share that should be able to grow that over time by about 10% a year, we believe we are meeting the requirements that Whitman looks for.  The key issues are whether Bank of America is financially strong, which we believe they are now after substantial reserving and capital injections, and whether management is acting in shareholder's best interests, which we do have confidence now after seeing the progress Brain Moynihan is making. Assuming the company is a survivor which seems very likely, the company should trade at  tangible book value around $12.50, and we believe they should be able to grow that by 10-15% a year moving forward. Whitman's checklist is one which we use on each security that we select and I felt it very much worthwhile to introduce him to those of you that aren't familiar.  Below you can find a link to his most recent letter:

http://www.thirdave.com/ta/documents/reports/TAF%201Q%20Report%20and%20Letters.pdf



Sunday, March 4, 2012

Update from December 19th post: Some of the lowest valuations ever! Some data to prove it.

On December 19th I sent out an email discussing the unbelievably cheap valuations that we were seeing, which you can see from the forwarded email below.  This is just a quick update on how they are faring.  The point is not to get overly excited, just as we don’t want to get overly pessimistic when stocks drop.  The key is to understand that you are buying businesses, and in our case we are buying businesses on a mass clearance sale!

It is our opinion that many of these stocks will be 2-3 times higher over the next 3-5 years, while others are likely to pay out prodigious dividends, and might have 50-75% upside potential.  It is a testament to the quality of the clients of TTCM, that we don’t receive panicked calls reacting to day by day stock fluctuations, as we firmly believe that by staying the course we can reach our financial goals.  Last year was one of the most frustrating years ever for hedge funds and money managers, but I honestly don’t recall one client panicking and making rash decisions due to the severe fluctuations that we saw.  Avoiding that behavior is like avoiding smoking cigarettes. Over time it is inevitably a bad idea to take a short term trader mentality, just like over time it is inevitable that cigarette smoking will negatively impact your health.  I’ll continue to provide updates on this list through good and bad as I think it represents a decent barometer for assessing equities held in many of our separately managed accounts.  If you held equal dollar amounts of each stock from December 19th until today you would be up 24.46%.  Thank you very much and as always is you have any questions whatsoever please don’t hesitate to contact us!


1)      ABT- $54.33 Earnings Yield 10%, Dividend Yield 3.5%, likely to grow earnings by 8-10% a year Stock is at $57.39- up 5.6%
2)      AIG- $22.55 Forward P/E 8.7, P/B Ratio .5 Stock is at $29.80- up 32%
3)      AGO- $12.99 Forward P/E 4.3, P/B .5 Stock is at $17.33- up 33.4%
4)      BAC- $5.02, Forward P/E 5.1, P/B .2 Stock is at $8.13- up 62%
5)      C- $24.86, Forward P/E 5.7, P/B .4 Stock is at $34.10- up 37%
6)      CSCO- $17.77, Forward P/E 9.2, P/B 2, $6 of net cash on the balance sheet Stock is at $19.76- up 11.2%
7)      MSFT- $25.75, Forward P/E 8.4, P/B 3.6, Dividend Yield 3.08% Stock is at $32.07- up 24.5%
8)      MS- $14.25, Forward P/E 6.8, P/B .5 Stock is at $18.87- up 32.4%
9)      SHLD- $45.61, P/B .6 Stock is at $75.96- up 67%
10)   HPQ-  $25.36, Forward P/E 5.6, P/B 1.3 Stock is at $25.32- flat
11)   TEVA- $41.80, Forward P/E 10, P/B 1.7 Stock is at $45.25- up 8.3%
12)   TEF- $16.65, Forward P/E 7.6, Dividend Yield 10.14 Stock is at $17.04- up 4%
13)   BP-  $40.78, P/E 5.6, Dividend Yield 4.06%, P/B 1.2 Stock is at $47.50- up 16.5%
14)   RIG- $39.54, Forward P/E 11.7, P/B .6, Dividend Yield 7.93% Stock is at $54.19- up 37%
15)   NVS- $56.35, Forward P/E 10, P/B 2.1, Dividend Yield 3.61%.Stock is at $54.02- down 4%